Haimons Covert Scheme Essay -- essays research papers

Haimon has a genuine tendency to be overlooked in Sophocles Antigone. At first he appears to be a minor character, an accessory to the overt involvement occurring surrounded by Kreon and Antigone. We see Haimon supporting his commence, barely soon in that locationafter in conflict with him. Haimon expresses disregard for the life of his cold bride to be, yet is defined as macrocosm driven by proclivity. Several questions come up who does Haimon re wholey support, what drives his actions, and what is his last intent? Unraveling these issues is a tricky task, but what we find is Haimon is far more than an accessory. Haimon is introduced in third-person, making his character easily overlooked and marginalized from the start. Ismene says oh dearest Haimon, how your father dishonors you, yet he isnt even present (573). When Haimon does enter, his father assumes he knows of the situation, meaning he had time to plot his actions. Haimon begins by showing Kreon that he is really o n his side, a very common technique for noise that washbasin be found in much(prenominal) books as Dale Carnegies. The world-wide idea is to start by wining a persons advance so he will be more open to rebuke later. It not uncommon to hold the view that Haimon isnt using such a technique but actually does support Kreon, however there are problems with such a view. Haimon says an interesting ambiguous statement your judgments, cosmos good ones, guide my path aright (636). The ambiguity is subtle, but it can buoy imply Haimon follows only when Kreons judgment is good. As of yet no disagreement has surfaced, but when it does it also shows a degree of planning. Haimon maintains distance from motto his father is wrong, by mentioning that the city favors Antigones actions and things might also writhe out well some other way (687). Haimon then presents a parable on a ship, if he who holds the power strains the rigging leotards and does not yield, he turns his rowing benches over and completes his voyage upside wad (715). The refinement of the parable does not imply an improvised remark but something premeditated. At this point the reader should ask what motivated this veer in Haimons views or was it even a change at all? Within a short span of time Haimons utter views change, but there is no clear motivator for the change. Perhaps that... ...character, to gestate motivation and intent. Changes in a characters view presumet occur spontaneously, motivation for change or previous antic regarding the view must be considered. If one moment Haimon supports Kreon and the next opposes him, what causes this change? Likewise, the reader should consider what the character is doing while not the focus of attention. Haimon knew astir(predicate) the events that were unraveling, what can he plan while the focus is elsewhere? indistinct terms factor greatly into an interpretation of Haimons motivation. Lust and heating are associated with women, but can just as easily be applicable to power or money. Looking at these issues combined we can answer the original questions whom does Haimon support, what drives his actions, and what is his ultimate intent? Haimon does not support Kreon he does support Antigones views, but is not bothered by threats of her death. As the chorus states, Haimon is driven by lust, but this lust is for power quite than for Antigone. Combine these issues together and what we find is Haimons intent he seeks to utilise a situation where Kreon is in poor standing to fulfill his lust for power by taking the throne.